That’s £2.3k each if split evenly.

That seems pretty cheap given how much marketing (particularly when involving “talent”) usually costs, assuming these campaigns actually had some kind of measurable success.

Why does this read kinda like rage bait? I don’t really expect that from the guardian

Edit: just another helpful number I remembered, for context:

The Tories spent £100m on an advertising campaign to gaslight us with how great Brexit was going to be as it happened

That’s 200x for much less tangible benefit

Cool. Let’s see how much the Tory cunts have spaffed off on completely unnecessary crap and let’s compare.