• Rooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If this is true, then we should prepare to be shout at by chatgpt why we didnt knew already that simple error.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Always love those answers, well if you read the 700 page white paper on this one command set in one module then you would understand… do you think I have the time to read 37000 pages of bland ass documentation yearly on top of doing my actual job? Come the fuck on.

        I guess some of these guys have so many heads on their crews that they don’t have much work to do anymore but that’s not the case for most

      • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        And then links to a similar sounding but ultimately totally unrelated site.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Take all you want, it will only take a few hallucinations before no one trusts LLMs to write code or give advice

    • sramder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      […]will only take a few hallucinations before no one trusts LLMs to write code or give advice

      Because none of us have ever blindly pasted some code we got off google and crossed our fingers ;-)

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s way easier to figure that out than check ChatGPT hallucinations. There’s usually someone saying why a response in SO is wrong, either in another response or a comment. You can filter most of the garbage right at that point, without having to put it in your codebase and discover that the hard way. You get none of that information with ChatGPT. The data spat out is not equivalent.