• Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Funny I was pondering the same thing. What would Trump do if Nvidia moved to somewhere outside US jurisdiction?
      It’s very serious for Nvidia to lose about 45% of their revenue. But they also need to keep their development teams running.
      Can they do that if they move?

      https://asymmetric-investing.beehiiv.com/p/nvidia-s-china-problem-big-tech-s-new-headwind

      But this is really serious for Nvidia! As far as I can figure it’s about $33 billion profits in a year they stand to lose!!!

      https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/NVDA/

      Based on market cap and P/E.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Would they even need to move? Just create a China based subsidiary and sell them consultancy in the form of expert chip designers.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          As long as they are headquartered in USA, the company is under American law, and USA can simply forbid them to expand to China.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Be a shame they’ve left a poorly configured VPN node that allowed someone from a Chinese IP dump unknown quantities of IP. Happens all the time. And oh look the Chinese subsidiary hired some really talented people that got a new chip design in a record time!

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think if NVIDIA moves outside of the US, Trump would have no choice but to keep exempting their products from the import tariffs since there’s no US-made alternative at the moment and there won’t be one for a while. But NVIDIA may not have a choice but to move out, especially if they want to keep their market position against Chinese firms over the long run. If they stay in the US they face a likely future of being locked into the US market with the rest of the world being dominated by whatever competitive accelerators come out of China. If they move out, and especially if they move to China, they could become the CCP-blessed domestic AI hardware maker, before another Chinese firm is able to get there. They’ll have the world market to export to as well as the US, for as long as the US doesn’t have a competitive product. After that it’ll be just the rest of the world since China’s NVIDIA product would always have price advantage compared to US offerings. Of course under a China NVIDIA scenario they likely won’t be able to keep their IP fully closed or their profit margins within China, and perhaps abroad.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          There is a problem though, if they move to China they can’t produce at TSMC. That is why I stated outside US jurisdiction. Apart from that I agree.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            True. That’s a problem with the China route at this point. In a few years however I’d expect SMIC to be competitive with TSMC. They’re doing their damnest to get there and given the pressure and resources thrown at it, I think it’s a matter of time.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Team Green plans to get closer to the Chinese markets by building a dedicated R&D center in China as well, which means that NVIDIA is serious about this move.

    Yup, of course they are. As I said the other day, US firms for which their userbase is not the product face long term downside as the US state cuts them off of foreign markets or the foreign markets cuts them off as retaliation to the US state trade policies. If they keep their product development in the US they’re facing reduced markets and increased dependence on the US state. And of course increased competition by foreign (e.g. China’s Huawei) firms catching up to fill the demand gap. If they manage to fill the gap with price competitive product, there’s no coming back for NVIDIA.