Sharing leak is sexual abuse wtf? That s just theft content , not cool for the performer but some overmonetize their work so I see why you would want to share a 100$ video in return for other pricy content.
I mean, why wouldn’t sharing sexual pictures and videos outside of the given consent by the performer be sexual abuse? If you perform in a porn video for a porn company and sign all documents, it is clear that you know and agree that the video will be sold publicly. If you send a nude to someone in private, you totally are not agreeing to be posted on the internet. OnlyFans is kind of in between - if you post something there for your subscribers, the consent is that the subscribers see the content after paying for it.
Suddenly, explicit photos and videos of her were being spread and resold like wildfire alongside abusive material: upskirting videos and photos of sleeping, naked women.
I think you deliberately skipped this part of the article.
Though they seem secure behind a paywall, swiping content creators’ explicit photos and videos from subscription-based platforms such as OnlyFans, Patreon, and Fansly is relatively easy. People can download third-party apps for the task, and if those don’t work, a few basic coding tutorials can teach them how to surpass anti-theft technology. These images and videos then proliferate across the internet, on niche forums, Reddit threads, Discord servers, and Telegram groups with tens of thousands of participants. Today, a growing legal consensus considers this activity to be sexual abuse.
Sharing leak is sexual abuse wtf? That s just theft content , not cool for the performer but some overmonetize their work so I see why you would want to share a 100$ video in return for other pricy content.
Damn, I can’t believe I accidentally sexually abused Kate Winslet by pirating Titanic.
Someone should stop you
It’s not even theft, it’s piracy.
It’s not piracy, it’s unauthorised copying. No boats and murder here.
deleted by creator
I mean, why wouldn’t sharing sexual pictures and videos outside of the given consent by the performer be sexual abuse? If you perform in a porn video for a porn company and sign all documents, it is clear that you know and agree that the video will be sold publicly. If you send a nude to someone in private, you totally are not agreeing to be posted on the internet. OnlyFans is kind of in between - if you post something there for your subscribers, the consent is that the subscribers see the content after paying for it.
I think you deliberately skipped this part of the article.
I think you deliberately skipped this part.