• andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not really down with burning the books, just that Rowling is using money from the series to fund a campaign against trans people.

    I’m not going to spend money that someone is going to use to turn around and attack my rights with.

    Like, if I was in the UK - it would be illegal for me to piss basically anywhere. Trans women are supposed to use the men’s, but because trans men are autistic self hating lesbians (the kind of shitty propaganda that bitch funds) we don’t exist and can’t piss in the men’s or the women’s.

    I’m not very opposed to the mediocre children’s book series for their content - it’s just typical “the status quo is good actually.” I’m not going to give money to people who are using their money to hurt me.

    • vala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Can we please avoid “autistic” as an insult.

      Edit: I get that this was hyperbole/satire but it still can hurt people’s feelings.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I didn’t read it as an insult. If it was, then “lesbians” was an insult, too. It sounds like OP’s just using the hate-mongers’ own words.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s literally what they call trans men. That is the argument. We are all supposedly autistic, which means that we can’t be trusted to make decisions over our own bodies. That is constantly used to infantilize us, and will eventually be used to take away our ability to access transition.

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wouldn’t want to give any money to her but I also wouldn’t be opposed to purchasing HP books from a thrift store that donates funds to charity and then burning them just for the sake of removing just a little bit of her legacy from the world.

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t want to burn the books, just strip Rowling of ownership so she doesn’t profit off of them any further is all. Maybe put them in the public domain early

    • mineralfellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The displays at pretty much every bookstore I have been to recently are pretty massive. And kids still like the stories. It is hard to argue against a small child who is begging to read a massive book, as opposed to a kid wanting to stare at a screen all day.

    • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not surprised; Blahaj mods are pretty known for being ptb. Say one tiny thing they don’t like and suddenly you’re an [something]phobic bigot.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      The crazy fundamentalists support her now. It’s all over Facebook.

      There’s a difference between burning a book as a political statement because the author is actively harming you, and having a meltdown because the book has magic in it.

      It also makes me uncomfortable that you characterize this as “sides.” As a trans person, my “side” is that I deserve to live, have access to medical care, and be treated equitably. Treating this like it’s an issue with “sides” is fucked up - one “side” thinks that all trans people should be forced back into the closet or detransitioned against our will, the other “side” just wants to be fucking alive.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    I kinda feel vindicated now. after the whole “dumbledore is gay” thing, I complained that it was bullshit and made absolutely zero sense.

    the whole journey none of it came up once, nor did it progress his character arch at all. it was a bit of fluff that sold books.

    it cheapened the struggles of being gay IMO and honestly makes more sense now than it did then considering what kind of a vile troll she is.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Dumbledore is gay but celibate. He fell in love with a guy and it blew up in his face and led to the death of his sister, after which he decided not to fall in love again. That makes me suspect Rowling is one of those people that thinks it’s okay to be gay but not okay to act on it.

  • intheformbelow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Overfixation on sexual identity issues is bad for trans people. Slow and steady progress is better than letting radicals steal the microphone. If you don’t believe me, take a look at what Alberta and Saskatchewan are doing to trans rights. The only reason they are persecuting trans people is to spite the previous federal government whose performance was so lackluster that they resorted to identity politics slogans in order to appear “progressive”. Trans people already have it tough. Using them as a banner instead of actually supporting them is going to make things even more difficult for them.

  • Shayeta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yup, the month has only begun but I’ve already bought a 2nd Order of the Phoenix to burn. Poetic, really.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The left wing is gonna boycott the Harry Potter tv series cause of Rowling’s transphobia, and the right wing is gonna boycott because Snape is black