When hammers were invented, people were like, “Cool! So much easier and faster than screwing! And even cheaper!”

And they threw away their screwdrivers and happily hammered their screws in, telling each other how much better things had become.

This is a story about AI.

  • janonymous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    What? Ignoring that screwdrivers where invented after the hammer, what exactly should this tell me about AI?

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Throwing away effective tools and replacing them with generic LLMs, because of hype. Eg. throwing away physical customer support and replacing people with a chatbot.
      Not using (online) dictionaries but asking an LLM for every word.
      Using LLMs to parse static stuff (eg. parse json and extract vars). Yes, some people do that.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Ironically, I had to use AI to figure out what this is supposed to mean.

    Here’s the intended meaning:

    The author is critiquing the misapplication of AI—specifically, the way people adopt a flashy new tool (AI, in this case) and start using it for everything, even when it’s not the right tool for the job.

    Hammers vs. screwdrivers: A hammer is great for nails, but terrible for screws. If people start hammering screws just because hammers are faster and cheaper, they’re clearly missing the point of why screws exist and what screwdrivers are for.

    Applied to AI: People are now using large language models (like ChatGPT) or generative AI for tasks they were never meant to do—data analysis, logical reasoning, legal interpretation, even mission-critical decision-making—just because it’s easy, fast, and feels impressive.

    So the post is a cautionary parable: just because a tool is powerful or trendy (like generative AI), doesn’t mean it’s suited to every task. And blindly replacing well-understood, purpose-built tools (like rule-based systems, structured code, or human experts) with something flashy but poorly matched is a mistake.

    It’s not anti-AI—it’s anti-overuse or misuse of AI. And the tone suggests the writer thinks that’s already happening.

    • 7uWqKj@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thanks. The fact that an AI understood it but a good lot of humans didn’t is somewhat concerning. 🤦

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Thinking about hammering in a screw puts a very serious frown on my face…

    Upvote for creativity though.

  • SolidShake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why are so many people literally terrified about a computer that can write a paragraph for you? AI has been around for literal decades.