The most recent South Park episode, featuring a naked Donald Trump, may have violated the law.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    5 months ago

    While this article is technically correct on some things, it’s somewhat missing the entire point of what Matt and Trey did very intentionally. They want Trump to try and sue them.

    Trump has inappropriately promoted and used various AI depictions of some seriously fucked up shit, and therefore would immediately lose in court if trying to sure based on the existing laws. In fact, they never showed Trump’s dick. They just alluded to it being his dick…with AI.

    I would FUCKING LOVE for Trump to try and sue them, because Matt and Trey will make it the circus it deserves to be, get some amazing stuff in discovery, and they can fucking afford not only defending themselves and their content from frivolous lawsuits, but then countersue and fuck Trump and all of his cronies up when it comes out who has been pulling the strings with the absolutely batshit insane stuff that gets posted on his accounts, and government accounts being misused in an official capacity to push dogshit.

    I look forward to this with a shwaybone.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Trump has inappropriately promoted and used various AI depictions of some seriously fucked up shit, and therefore would immediately lose in court if trying to sure based on the existing laws.

      Yeah, that makes zero sense.

      1. The Supreme Court has ruled that the President can’t be charged from crimes committed while in office. That’s why he’s walking free today instead of rotting in a fucking jail cell where he belongs.

      2. The commission of a crime does not suddenly excuse everyone else from committing said crime.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are you out of the loop?

        Trump had posted to his own Truth account a week ago an AI generated video of Obama being arrested in the White House.

        Are you a fucking bot, or just ignorant?

        The way this works in a legal sense is that Trump would be fucking foolish to try and sue a CABLE show (not under FCC purview) that did what he did. Present an obviously fake depiction of something as fact.

        Not only will he lose in court because Trump set the precedent for doing so, he will be open to countersuit just because of that fact.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I am not out of the loop. #2 was referring to that incident. Your personal insults are unwarranted.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Your post does not cover CIVIL SUITS, which is where this all would lie in the courts.

            Trump will lose, open himself up to discovery, and allow an entire binge by legal process into every little part of what is going on right now, which his lawyers will not allow.

            I think you’re commenting on something you don’t understand, no offense.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Your post does not cover CIVIL SUITS

              You’re the one who’s referring to criminal law:

              would immediately lose in court if trying to sure based on the existing laws

              The defense of “nuh-uh, he did it first” will simply not hold water in a court of law.

              Discovery does not work the way you think it does.

              I think you’re commenting on something you don’t understand, no offense.