• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Agreed for the most part, but I disagree about the 100% taxes thing. I think we should instead cap inheritance/gifts, not income. You can be as wealthy as you want, but once you die, it all goes back to the common pot.

    I don’t care about rich people, I mostly just care about generational wealth.

    • _g_be@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, those are kinda two sides of the same coin. Both ways to limit the compounding of wealth in few hands.

      I’m open to all these ideas, and more

      • PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Wealth and income are two different things. We should tax wealth savagely, i.e., the ownership of assets, and we should also tax income, but to a lesser degree.

        Just to level set: income refers to the flow of money earned over a period, like a salary or wages, while wealth represents the accumulated assets minus liabilities at a specific point in time