• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      And a partial refund at that.

      Better option would be to require the senior Deloitte partners and managers to do real community service program (live-in junior janitor at homeless shelter or a hospice) for 6 months (with an asset freeze for the duration of community service).

      • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s ridiculous. The fact that a significant part of the report was clearly fraudulent calls into question the merit of the entire report. How could anyone take it seriously after finding dozens of fraudulent sources? They should sue to recover 100% of what was paid.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I still think personal responsibility (as outlined in my post above) is a far better option that a fine.

          A fine is the cost of business. I don’t think a senior Deloitte partner or manager would like to do a 6 month mandatory de-mining community service program (Australia can send them to my country, Ukraine, as part of a community service exchange program).

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ahhhh, it’s been at least 20 mins or so since i had a reason to say “Fuck Deloitte”

    Fuck Deloitte

    Fuckers deserve to rot

  • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    AI will replace jobs!

    … Maybe. But not a lot. And as long as they try, stuff like this will keep happening.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      AI will create jobs, millions of jobs, for intelligent people to sift through the AI slop searching for pearls. It will become harder every year, so they will always need more people to do it. It’s unclear what happens when the AI slop outpaces humanity’s ability to filter it. I guess we can call it “the technological singularity nobody wanted”.

        • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think that’s overly optimistic. I sure hope the bubble bursts soon so tech giants will stop spending countless billions raping the environment and forcing it down our throats. But the tech is out there now, and it’s a panacea for spammers, scammers, propagandists, and anyone who wants to subtly manipulate people or push an ideology on a massive scale. It’s going to keep being tweaked and adjusted to keep it at least somewhat undetectable on some level, just like spammers have always done, as long as they can still push some of their slop through the filters. The bubble may burst, but the tech is not going away. Even if we outlawed it, that just means only the outlaws will keep using it. And they absolutely will, because the randomness and hallucinations don’t bother them. In fact it’s not even really much different from the tools they have already used to avoid anti-spam and anti-bot filters. Accuracy is not their goal. The barest hint of believability combined with sheer, overwhelming quantity are their goal. And Generative AI is perfect for that goal.

          • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Almost all distant future hard sci-fi settings have banned or severely limited AGI, sometimes proactively, often making it among the highest universally recognized crimes, sometimes after a war, or sometimes unsuccessfully (in which case the story’s going to be about regretting it). Either way, if fiction authors can reliably figure out the inevitable plot line the technology follows, perhaps we will too, eventually.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Refunding is far from enough, there should be a steep fine for fraudulent work.

  • Totonator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Whoever did that report along with the reviewer should be fired for that. AI is just a tool, not a freaking replacer.