Video by “German science guy”

not available in Germany

So… What are those two stars for then?

Nah. This works. It’s a good focus to keep.

You would have a point if they said what you wrote, but it’s

Denn ich sag es nur ein mal

So it’s literally “because”.

And then they repeat it, yes. 🤷

The whole episode was terrific. I mean, I couldn’t watch it in one go, the Fremdscham was just too hard, but man, every ten minute piece I could bear was just on point.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz-htW9DTus

It’s annoying to explain
Because it’s actually quite simple
So listen closely
Because I’ll say it only once

If you’re anti-ANTIFA you are FA You can say what you want
But that’s the truth
And I wish I didn’t have to constantly be against something But how is that supposed to work with all those goddamn Nazi pigs?

And if it annoys you to hear that that’s not my problem
but your problem… not hard to understand at all.

I could take care of nice things
We could take care of nice things
Instead, we have to deal with the scum

If you’re anti-ANTIFA you are FA You can say what you want
But that’s the truth
And I wish I didn’t have to constantly be against something But how is that supposed to work with all those goddamn Nazi pigs?

How is that supposed to work?
How is that supposed to work?
How is that supposed to work, please?

So… Who processes the donation?

Isn’t Europe like… The bigger of the two markets? Can somebody explain to me why we didn’t just tell him to fuck off and have him eat his damn tariffs?

If you can bear the cringe of the interviewer, there’s a good interview with Penrose that goes on the same direction: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e9484gNpFF8

It’s not a single bit worse than before the announcement.

No no no, you don’t get it! Humans only have eyes, so cars that only have eyes should perform just as good as humans! Disregard that humans don’t perform well in fog or rain or generally anything that isn’t good weather and also disregard that to match our eyes’ resolution you’d need extremely high resolution cameras that produce way too much data for current computers and also disregard that most of the stuff isn’t happening in our eyes but in our brains and also disregard that the point that is usually being made to advocate for self driving cars is that they should be better than humans!

How can you be so dense?

Using a calculator for math is cheating unless it has been explicitly allowed. Which it isn’t until higher grades because before that, people are supposed to do math without a calculator. Which they should do to get a proper understanding about the subject.

The same holds for literally any tool. If the goal is to get the students to be able to convincingly communicate their thoughts or to see if they understood a topic by making them explain it, having them use chatgpt accomplished nothing and just wastes everybody’s time. If the goal is to see if they can produce enough bullshit to satisfy an average public administration, then letting them use llms might be valid. Just like any other tool, it’s legitimate to allow llms or not, based on whatever is supposed to end up in a student’s head. But using it without it being allowed is cheating, simple as that.

• i actually think that if pickups had lower hoods, they would be more moral, yes, because they would be less dangerous. (see above)

Fair point. I agree.

I always assumed that the bonnet height was one of the reasons why you couldn’t really drive one of those in Europe anyway. But if that’s not the case then yes, adjusting that should be done.

(Also I drive a van and I think it’s cool since obviously I’m cool and so my car kinda has to be, too, so I’m not sure if I agree with your first point.)

Hm. Don’t know.

This one?

Yeah, can be banned.

But this one?

Don’t know. While it’s a fair bit shorter than an f150, it’s still a big-ass car. But is it an unethical car? It fits a lot of stuff or a lot of people or a fair amount of both, but I guess the same thing is true for the f150. Visibility is much better I guess, but would pick ups be more moral if they had a lower hood?

Like, yeah, I hate pick ups, too, but what’s their defining aspect? What’s the law that gets rid of large SUVs but keeps station wagons? Or is the law just going to get rid of all larger cars?

I’m not trying to argue against the idea of banning dick comparison cars, this is a genuine question.

I’d even say that this illustrates the success even more…

• lemm.ee shuts down, iirc, because it took too much time and effort to run the instance. Not really a sign of inactivity.
• the platform keeps going! The whole idea of a federated network works, as a single instance going down doesn’t impact other ones. As it happened before, see e.g. feddit.de.

So Lemmy as a whole is alive and healthy - and successful.

What does that have to do with my weight?

I don’t want slimmer, I want smaller! Give me back my 4.5" screen 😩

So you’re spewing irrelevant nonsense just to ridicule people who call you out on your irrelevant nonsense by telling them you know it’s irrelevant nonsense?

Your point is purely anecdotal. I see lots of Teslas where I live, so there’s that. I also see more BEVs than PHEVs, which is also in line with sales figures.

So, to be blunt, I think your perception is skewed or wrong.

But there are other people in parks. Why the fuck would I want to deal with their bullshit when I can just have my own park?