I feel like examples that prove it using some standard definitions are a prerequisite to that conversation.
Without standard definitions such as selection method/criterium and controlling for variables such as external factors your basically asking me to refute apples with oranges.
Leopards Eating Punim
There is the whole myth that ancient people couldn’t see the colour blue. But that was because they didn’t have a distinct word for it that didn’t include other shades like purple.
TBF you are a tactless individual.
They work in conjunction. Porn doesn’t present a complete picture and social media personalities fill those blanks with misogyny.
deleted by creator
“Step-bro mom and dad wanna talk to us.”
(I’m so sorry. I couldn’t not)
The USB drive has to be the right format but otherwise I’ve had almost no issues. Works much better than the $30 android box from china.
I never had issues with Plex, same use case. But when my old pc died I opted to buy the 4k ONN device and store the files on USB.
I guess you’d take it sitting down. Or do you think they’re quadrupling down on this AI bubble to create some utopia for all of us?
So you gotta understand, I’m a history buff with a financial background that dabbles in cybersecurity. So like this is me speculating based on my own view.
Do you have any sources that cite figures that would suggest this? To be honest, I have my doubts
Can you be more specific? I want to give you a high quality response when I have time.
So you’re not concerned about general purpose humanoid robots being used to replace human workforces entirely?
Most of what you say is nonsense,
Refute it then. Cuz right now you’re just displaying the brain off behaviour I was describing.
I think everyone banking on the AI bubble bursting and that being the end of AI slop are going to be very, very, disappointed with what is about to happen.
AI is going to keep getting better at things. The existence of AI slop or trash vibe coding has no bearing on future capabilities of these models.
The AI “bubble” is less of a bubble and more of a ball and cup game exchanging real assets. So while the redundancy in stock market valuations is fluff… the data centers, energy production, and computer chips, and robots are not. Those things will still exist after any bubble bursts.
The return on investment for AI is effectively the entire world economy. Their goal with AI is to entirely eliminate the need to pay human labourers. Whoever owns that AI will defacto become the most profitable & powerful entity in the fucking world.
AI will transform warfare and violence on levels on comparable with the invention of projectile weapons and gunpowder. When the AI bubble bursts the Military-Industrial-Complex will simply buy the dip.
I really don’t like AI… but we can’t afford to turn our brains off at “AI Slop” and not think realistically (or at least pessimistically) about what’s coming next.
It’s actually pretty sad. Kinda scary to.
90% of the time I’m only looking for advice on a single aspect. How long to cook X at Y? Can I put X in Y? List required ingredients. etc.
Just makes sense to add gemini to the search and get the answer I’m looking for immediately.
Even moreso than the dudes who shot their own dicks to own the libs
Disagreeing with established norms? That’s a shottin.
I still think you need to present examples that fit your definitions first. Assuming we’re only talking about selectivity here. Also you’ve kind of raised the bar on yourself by stipulating democracy, egalitarianism, etc.
IMO if you control for selectivity you will find that it’s statistically insignificant and that the success of those examples was due to other factors not how selective they are.
Like the closest thing I would agree exists is mennonites/etc but you don’t count patriachial and religious.