Where are they leaving/going to?

Xitter had a very sharp worsening as a platform, and yet, somehow, still remains very relevant.

Quoting the quote from the article (so it’s more obvious and accessible here):

The Indie Game Awards have a hard stance on the use of gen AI throughout the nomination process and during the ceremony itself. When it was submitted for consideration, a representative of Sandfall Interactive agreed that no gen AI was used in the development of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. In light of Sandfall Interactive confirming the use of gen AI art in production on the day of the Indie Game Awards 2025 premiere, this does disqualify Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 from its nomination. While the assets in question were patched out and it is a wonderful game, it does go against the regulations we have in place. As a result, the IGAs nomination committee has agreed to officially retract both the Debut Game and Game of the Year awards.

Why would applications have to consider relayouting? Isn’t that entirely in the hand of the Windows taskbar?

It shows the window groups, windows, pops over previews of windows or tabs in a consistent style, presumably owned by the taskbar itself. At no point do applications themselves control their positions or size in the taskbar or the taskbar popovers.

The taskbar items can’t have a constant width. Your whole taskbar layout changes when you change a tab in Firefox. You have to open a set of programs from right to left, because any other order will change the positions of the items you want to click.

When not combining windows, in Windows 10 you could order them to your preference and usefulness. Now, you’re stuck. Even when not combined, the items are combined in one block, and you can’t order them within the block either.

That’s only musk though. Hardly “was undeniable fact”.

Remember when it was an undeniable fact that most cars would be driving entirely by themselves by now?

They fear falling behind other browsers and losing users because of it.

They see AI prevalence and see it as an opportunity to profile and position Mozilla as a leader in “ethical ai”.

They see AI use cases and success and think they have to integrate it to have additional, useful, significant features.

Unfortunately, it’s proprietary licensed. I was wondering if there was an opportunity for protest use, but that’s difficult with restricted licenses.

That’s what they do, yes. Unfortunately, it’s not fully drone-proof.

/edit: You can see it in this video, if you’re interested

The amount of optic fiber cables from drone use spread across fields is insane.

There is no such sentiment. There are political parties across the spectrum, of course, and it’s quite obvious to everyone, including the press and citizens, that the current implementation is not sustainable long-term. But there is no public sentiment or consensus about dismantling it. Honestly, this is the first time I’ve heard of this ask/claim/argument of dismantling as the goal or necessity.

I was wondering/suspecting they were being sarcastic as well, but I don’t know.

accused of repeat copyright infringements

Does this court determine whether this concrete accusation against a person holds as well, or does this court determine whether an accusation is enough?

Is that the conclusion? I thought that’s still under investigation. I remember reading about it months after the first reports.

It’s sad how huge companies are basically their CEO. CEO makes decisions and talks - that’s the company. Even if the hundreds and thousands of workers below them [largely] disagree and would do differently.

Exactly, one of the ways. And it’s a bandaid that doesn’t work very well. Because it’s probabalistic word association without direct association to intention, variance, or concrete prompts.

They link to it in the article, but for visibility, the resignation of Japanese SUMO community lead, contributor of 20 years. They voice their concrete issues.

deleted by creator

Until they fake author or print dates.

Google’s fault. Their prevalence and search ranking decisions.

edit: I dropped the"entirely" from “Google’s fault” because I guess it’s a decision by the platforms and without too, even if the alternative means less to no discoverability on Google.

It’s for the last sentence, “and no one would ever misunderstand a joke online again”. Not the whole article.

I mean… Just don’t use Google services!?

What kind of guide or in depth are you looking for? It’s a broad field. Google covers a lot.