RaivoKulli

I don’t know if Apple’s shenanigans are much better with how they’re trying to lock it down

Could be people commuting

If you’re hosting stuff visible to the wider world and you don’t really know what you’re doing you might have a bad time. But also just going for it is how you learn.

Damn a personal train that goes to wherever I want, whenever i want. That’s awesome.

The rail and energy infrastructure must cost a fortune though

We Finns travel to Estonia (and to Latvia) for cheap booze. Russians used to come to Finland for cheese which always makes me lol

Small communities can be nice but also it can get stuffy. And it can have some interesting consequences. Someone started freaking out about me stalking them because I replied to two (or three?) of their comments. I don’t think they knew how small of a place this is lol

This doesn’t seem to be hoping for unlimited growth but rather that is has stagnated and is even falling. That can kill a community especially when it is as small as it is

Michoacán is one of Mexico’s most violent states and is a battleground between various cartels and criminal groups fighting for control of territory, drug distribution routes and other illicit activities.

Idk in that sort of situation some tough policies might be warranted. Cartels got their way again though

I guess some don’t want to ask for the bathroom but it’s pretty common to be curious about someone’s home

Too private I guess

I generally don’t chitchat with strangers. It doesn’t cost anything in that situation not to talk, there’s no negative to it.

But that’s not how it would go in a situation where you just don’t make conversation. Or are you thinking they really want to have a conversation with you and are just thinking “oh gosh I’m so bummed that random person didn’t talk to me”? I don’t understand

I wouldn’t gamble on someone else’s money since it is not my money to gamble on. It should be up to them imo.

It’s like gambling on someone else’s money. You could do nothing and the situation stays the same, or you could run the risk of losing their money. You feel the odds are good so you go for it, I would feel shit about losing their money just because I wanted to gamble so I don’t do it. And they can gamble on their own too if they want to, it’s not like by not gambling on their behalf you’re preventing them from gambling.

I never said I was doing this “because I wanted to gamble.” I’m doing this because I believe that the chances are quite good at having a positive outcome for both me, and the person I’m interacting with. I additionally believe that the chances of a negative outcome are exceptionally low.

You’re describing gambling…

I’m not ignoring possibility of good things. I just don’t think it’s worth gambling that there’s a negative outcome. If you don’t do anything it won’t cause anything negative and they’re still free ro talk to you. I just wouldn’t want to risk causing someones day to be shittier because I wanted to gamble.

I don’t want to make anyone’s day worse. Gambling on someone else’s feelings just seems icky to me.

So you’re just gambling on their feelings, did I understand that correctly?

I don’t get how the articles “back you up” in this point

You’re almost insisting on talking to the people on a situation you know might negatively affect them and where they are stuck in the situation and that just seems odd.

What do the articles have to do with that?

You havent really addressed it propeely imo. I just don’t understand the mindset.

Well you won’t negatively affect them by not interacting with them. They are still free to talk to you, after all. The implication is a good one because they don’t know what sort of creep or angry person you might be and how you would react to rejection. You’re almost insisting on talking to the people on a situation you know might negatively affect them and where they are stuck in the situation and that just seems odd.