If you absolutely need to use Windows11, use Tiny11. But for the great majority of users, Zorin/Ubuntu/Mint or Bazzite are best pick

Very surprising from the country of freedom

Some companies make AI interviews, prompt breaking it to pass the interview xD

It sounds actually very funny to try and break it

true

Even though I hate a lot of what openAI is doing. Users must be more informed about llms, additional safeguards will just censor the model and make it worst. Sure they could set up a way to contact people when some kind of things are reported by the user, but we should take care before implementing a parental control that would be equivalent to reading a teen’s journal and invading its privacy.

In a way it’s similar to pseudoscientific alternative therapies people will say it’s awesome and no problem since it helps people, but since it’s based on nothing it actually gives people fake memories and can acerbate disorders

What I said is that smart people can be convinced to move to another platform. Most of my friends are not technically inclined, but it was easy to make them use it, at least to chat with me.

What you did is change “smart people” with “people who already want to move”, which is not the same. You then said it’s not something you can choose (as you cannot choose to be rich). But I answered that you can actually choose your friends.

Never did I say people who are not interested in niche technologies are not smart. My statement can be rephrased in an equivalent statement “people who cannot be convinced to change are not smart”, and I stand to it.

Why are you friend with stupid people?

Just need to move everyone. Not that hard honestly, if you are around smart people

Sams everything

Probably an emergent structure out of a chain of thought

Very interesting. Fixing one of the most common flaws of LLMs. If you can force them to follow proper structure they can generate better batch of test data samples, correct mathematical proofs in Lean, proper conlang words and sentences, proper json output for latter use by another tools, and obviously correct code generation in a specific version of a programming language.

I am non-american and pedantic though not pretentious, be it a counterexample *_*

To answer your question, It is safe to assume most people read the title and the abstract but don’t actually read the article

On what basis do you suppose one is worse than the other? I think both are

While you’re right. It would be better to say something like “I need it for my country” or “US needs it”. Since English doesn’t distinguish between inclusive and exclusive “we”, it can lead to the conclusion that the commenter supposes people reading their comment are from US as well.

Thanks !

What does the PR acronym stand for ?

Why do US citizens think everyone on the internet is from their country ?