You can still use

https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#contact-tool

Please write your own little text, possibly with a moderate amount of outrage. The texts on the tool are old I think and personal texts always have more impact.

Also adjust the Header so it cannot be filtered out.

https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#contact-tool

edit: Please write your own little text, possibly with a moderate amount of outrage. The texts on the tool are old I think and personal texts always have more impact.

Or you know… You could just push for solar on roofs…

Yes, that is why i switched to the Xcover which has

?

Its not even a flatrate

The pricing looks like its stacking quick if you do neither listen to the same songs over and over or entirely new ones, i dont know if I find the pricing fair for the consumer.

Oh shit I didn’t hear about the 6a also being fucked.

I lost my 4a to their shenanigans, couldn’t get it repaired and have now a Xcover 6 pro which I bought refurbished. Best modern phone: swappable battery, headphone jack, long software support, micro sd

Despite the blatant bait I’m going to take it: do you have any idea how much damage addiction to these substances costs the overall economy of a country? It’s a lot and the earlier people start the heavier the addiction is going to be.

I am sorry but as a pet peeve of mine I have to point out that gentrifying is maybe not a good choice of word here (which is why you probably placed it in quotes). Not everything which makes places more friendly to the general public is gentrification it refers to a process of pioneering the tractivity of an area subsequently followed by an increase in costs which drives out the original pioneers (if they do not keep pace economically) as a person studying urban planning and related stuff I think that the word gentrifying is used inflationary in recent times and is loosing a bit of its meaning 😅.

I do agree that parks should be inclusive and that means that cigarette smokes is an issue that has to be talked about. But I still think that blanket bans are not the way. maybe smokers areas like bbq areas. maybe time based phasing. maybe awareness campaigns? maybe a cultural shift that it is okay to tell smokers that one is bothered and of smokers to be more thoughtful of their second hand smoke? I feel like this people being bothered by other people is present in so many ways and in some people wouldnt even think about blanket bans and fines or it differs heavily between countries. TikTok on speaker in public places, bt-speakers with music, public alcohol consumption, reving your car, motorcyclist noise, body odor, live streaming etc pp a lot of stuff either is a huge problem or not depending on if people are considerate

Parks for me is also a bit of a headscratcher. Maybe something like banned in parks between 6:00 am to 21:00 pm could be a more differentiated solution?

I understand also the “your freedom ends where my freedom starts” but that is a two way statement IMO. Yes you should not smoke where you will bother other people, but if somebody wants to smoke in public (after considerations for children and littering have been made) its also their freedom that should not be impeded without good reason in a blanket way.

Personally I do not like dogs and feel significantly impeded in many freedoms due to their unquestioned ubiquity in public spaces. Your freedom to own a dog ends where my freedom to not be bothered by fear, noise and shit all over the place starts. sadly my freedom in this case is so far not respected enough by any means, but I still would not want them to be blanket banned in public spaces. I mean I personally would enjoy that but I do recognise that its also the freedom of other people to own a dog. I think similar arguments can be made about smoking…

Very interesting. I wonder whether the sinking ground water levels could be stabilized in the coming years by the increasing vegetation being able to hold and absorb more water in the landscape. I believe river ecosystems to be very very valuable and maybe some other adaption measures in the surrounding landscapes could help reduce the need for this reservoir. I personally do not think that nuclear should be invested in as a path for the future although it is probably sensible that existing plants should be kept running. My dream for Ukraine would be that it is helped by Europe to rebuilt in a resilient future proof way taking into account all the possible risks be it in conjunction of the climate/biodiversity crisis as well as geopolitical ones. If it is absolutely needed to be able to feed Ukraine and to get it back on its feet this should be a priority but it is so very important to not built back in the conventional way.

No. This holds some truth in general but the lng terminals built after the Ukraine invasion tell a different story. It is possible if it is needed.

However the story of the lng terminals also show why usually this should not be the case.

I’ll wait and see if this bs actually happens.

Wonderful. Still a fuckton of old people living alone or with two people in horses built for entire families. Understandable at an individual level for sentimental reasons but a catastrophe for the housing market and for society in general .

?

There are dedicated shitposting communities you know?

EDIT: Rule 7; example: !yurop@lemm.ee

https://youtu.be/wnR6pgK8WjE

https://youtu.be/5aRcXyhDiuQ

Two videos which are dissecting the German case of nuclear in a fair manner.

Unshielded if you ignore around 149.000.000 km distance. And it’s still the largest cause of skin cancer which is one of the most widespread ones.

You stupid fuck should think for a second before you spout bullshit in such a vile and disrespectful manner.

I’m down for being critical on the internet but you should go back straight to Reddit as that is the cesspool that this type of behaviour deserves.

What about the people living there? What about strategic thought? What benefits do you hope to gain from that? This seems very impulsive and short sighted.

I would rather prefer keeping them in the eu and use the influence there still is. They should not be able to veto anything though…