the phrase “international law” only exists to delegitimize the regimes of the united states’ enemies because only the united states and it’s allies gets to decide who is breaking “international law” by controlling international organizations that were ostensibly setup to enforce “international law” like the un or the icc.

we’re witnessing it happen with the sanctions the united states has placed on icc & icj who tried to apply “international law” to netanyahu & gallant and again with gvir & smotrich.

in the next decade or so, you’re going to learn of another president claiming that another regime has broken “international law” so we must invade/bomb them for doing so and a huge majority of americans will agree because it’s “international law”.

i bet most of the liberals aren’t too keen on it themselves.

canada actively aids the genocide in the same way that the united states and the united kingdom do; this is little more than political copycat of the french and british gov’ts so that the canadian gov’t can also insist that they were always on the right side of history when the next few generations read their history books in school.

if it’s pro-western, it’s always brilliant. lol

and implying that the united states didn’t help is willful ignorance at best since its diplomats worked to convince the iranians that it wasn’t going to happen.

it’s not necessary; we’re pretty good a spreading around the manufactured narratives ourselves.

Why is this news?

Propaganda

i wish i understood why it’s only the spanish politicans that are pushing for change

all platforms with investors behind it enshitify in the worse ways possible a la reddit, facebook, etc.