There’s high demand for both RAM and GPUs coming from datacenters. Us regular consumers are just a tiny blip on their radar.

It could’ve been worse

Do you use this for physical machines too?

The rice and bean barons will be competing for your attention.

Privacy concern for sure, but given that you can already tie different photos back to the same phone from lens artifacts, I don’t think this is going to make things much worse than they already are.

someone could create a virtual camera that would sign images

Anyone who produces cameras can publish a list of valid keys associated with their camera. If you trust the manufacturer, then you also trust their keys. If there’s no trusted source for the keys, then you don’t trust the signature.

I think there’s enough people who care about this that you can just provide the data and wait for someone to do the rest.

When I get a movement right, I keep repeating it over and over until it’s committed to memory. You’re saying I could’ve stopped at the first success? Why did no one tell me earlier?

The cancellation page specifically. Everything else is fine.

Does anyone know how these flying cars are different from helicopters?

if they didn’t consider the limitations

They did, and planned for it to the best of their abilities given the available resources. Being disabled doesn’t mean you stop trying to be a functional human being. The illogical thing to do is to sit at home and do nothing because you’re not 100% certain that things will go well. Because as you said,

Nothing is 100% efficient [or certain or guaranteed]

So should we not strive to make things as predictable as possible?

Everyone deserves empathy. All sentient beings, including this hypothetical man.

Again, all people deserve empathy

And yet, your ideal scenarios, you keep favouring one person/group at the expense of another. I don’t know if empathy is the word you actually mean to use. You can empathize with everyone while still favouring specific people, but your examples suggest that you’re using “empathy” to mean the actions you take (or don’t take) to help someone rather than the emotional state. In that case, it’s is indeed a binary either/or. In your examples, what you do to help one person will negatively affect others.

In these examples, the ideal scenarios described aren’t any more logical or empathetic than the real scenario. All you’re saying is that particular people are more deserving of empathy than the people who are affected by their actions.

• Example 1: People smell awful after smoking. Everyone else in the train sitting in the vicinity will have to deal with the smell for the duration of their ride. The more often this happens, the less likely people will be willing to take mass transit, leading to lots of other negative downstream effects for everyone on the planet. Do all these other people not also deserve empathy?
• Example 2: Timeliness has real effects on people’s lives. What if there’s a disabled man waiting on this bus at a later stop? They planned their errand so that it’s within their ability to handle given their disability, but a late bus means that the timing no longer aligns and it’ll significantly extend the duration past what they can safely handle. Would this man not also deserve empathy? Poor timeliness for mass transit would also discourage people from using them.
• Example 3: If the man smoking in example 1 is deserving of empathy with regards to his addictions, why not this passenger?

What’s this error recovery business you speak of?

LLMs are necessarily non-deterministic,

There’s nothing about LLMs that force them to be non-deterministic. Given the same prompts and context, they will always output the same probability distribution. It’s then up to you what you decide to do with that distribution. If you decide to always choose the most likely output, then the entire thing will be deterministic. We just don’t do that because it’s less useful than stochastic output.

Can’t we just stick to pinky swearing that I’m an adult?

How many bits is a /s mask?

I think the idea is that you keep the layout as simple as possible such that you don’t need any code for it, css or otherwise.

The problem with the subscription feed is that it shows you every channel that you’re subscribed to. If I only want to see cooking videos for example, then it has to be through the standard YouTube recommendations page. What it needs is the ability to manually group channels and let us choose which set of channels we want to see.

Context will tell you that we’re talking about losing access to water. If people won’t procreate because they don’t have water, it makes no difference if it’s because we are literally all out of water or if someone else is hoarding it all. In both cases, there’s no access to water.

Yes

It peaked when it was good enough to generate short somewhat coherent phrases. We’d make it generate ideas for silly things and laugh at how ridiculous the results were.