We could also have given Ukraine so much they won the war 2 years ago, problem is we also want healthcare, education and decent pensions. I mean it’s good the German army feels we should help Ukraine win the war but let’s not act as if this is a simple feat that doesn’t require a lot of money. Without free American weapons it will be a lot harder to defend ourselves against Putins warmongering.
According to her maybe, can’t imagine many people agree
- The Motion Picture Association (MPA) is pressing for VPN providers, proxies, and Content Delivery Systems to cooperate with anti-piracy measures
- The MPA also urges the EU to adopt an automated system that can block pirated content in real-time, without the need for court approval.
- Italy and France have already begun forcing some VPN and DNS services to block access to illegal streaming sites
I wonder in what ways he means dependence, because in a lot of ways we are getting less dependent on US but there are a few things we can’t do ourselves yet and it will take time to get it done. I hope he is saying we will have to rely on the US to appease Trump, knowing we should move away ASAP instead of him actually believing it. I’m afraid it is the latter.
As a dutchie who follows political news on a daily basis, I can confirm this researchers findings
Thanks I’m always a bit skeptical when it comes to big news corps framing financial stuff like this exactly because it can mean very different things for different people. And since I’m not a big corpo myself, I wonder whether they are right or not when talking about the effects on my personal life especially when the situation isn’t very extreme. Sounds like a small deflation for a short time doesn’t have to be a bad thing if you’re not in (high) debt, just like small inflation isn’t a bad thing even if you have some savings.
I like how they are the only party you can vote on in all levels of government, including Europe. Even if they only get 1/2/3 seats next election, I don’t see them going away any time soon.
Any economists here? I grew up being told 2% inflation is perfect, more is bad and less is bad. I am fine believing that, but does this mean this is bad news? Or is deflation for a short time good after high inflation?
I read the headline and thought this is just an article of crazy shit ai says, then I saw it was from Reuters and got confused. Apparently they mean ‘the ai industry’ and not ‘an ai chatbot’ is threatening the eu:
The EU wants to compete with the U.S. and China on artificial intelligence. But critics say policymakers haven’t planned for the sector’s extreme water demand.
Might have changed the outcome in Poland even, hope this interference will be taken serious.
Is your life full of problems? Call life coach Sauntek Harris now and he’ll get it fixed straight away! /s
Apparently these murders happened between 2002 and 2009 so maybe he just felt like doing something else for a change, leave the murdering behind him and became a life coach instead. I guess neither of those require a degree.
They just don’t have the cards
Is it me or is FT sliding further into Fox News territory? There was a time I considered them a good source of information but lately I’m questioning a lot of their journalism. Might be because I don’t visit their website and communities like this skew my view but damn they look more and more maga crazy from my pov.
This community is basically only political posts these days. I will comment and downvote until this community turns back to normal.
… on May 29, the German city of Aachen plans to honor von der Leyen with the prestigious Karlspreis award, partly for the “impetus she has given to the Green Deal”. The timing could not be more ironic: she’s now dismantling one of the Green Deal’s most meaningful achievements.
Yes these companies are losing money, but they have to pay money to the state also when they are not making money. I agree the angle of buying stuff from Russia equals supporting them is bs, but the Russian state does receive money from eu (for which eu gets gas and oil in return) that they can spend on waging war on Ukraine.
As a non-native speaker I had to think a moment before I understood the headline, because it’s so utterly bonkers I wondered if I missed a double meaning or something lol
This means an EU country could send an asylum seeker to a country halfway around the world, where she has never been, doesn’t speak the language, and has no cultural ties, family or community, and where prospects for a fair procedure and support for rebuilding her life could be in doubt. Under the new proposal, her appeal of the decision would no longer prevent her from being put on a plane before the appeal is considered.
I can’t speak for all countries but of the people assuming Europe will be fine, most seem to be rifht wing voters. It’s a good thing not everyone is in panic mode, but I agree people should be more aware of the current direction the world is heading in but there are also a lot of people who actually like this direction.