account feddit di @lgsp@urbanists.social
Nevertheless, Dudley Curtis points out that “over the last decade or more, the number of deaths on the roads in the United States has risen, while in Europe it has fallen slowly, but it has still fallen”.
In the meantime in Europe we want to halve the road deaths by 2030 and have no deaths on roads by 2050, and we are already far from being on track to hit the target:
I understand why you write this, but collecting data is the first step when you want to change something.
Even if a femomenon sounds obvious, maybe it is not. Moreover the study analyses also why this happens, and it is pretty interesting.
It should be possible to connect ghost 6 to the fediverse, so that anyone with mastodon, lemmy etc should be able to comment, like etc
But that’s very be difficult to implement. You would have to start a financial investigation for every fine, an impossible task.
On the other side the nominal value of a car could be easily computed via official tables based on model and age. And you can be sure that rich people will drive expensive car, even if they don’t own anything, on paper
In Italy this wouldn’t work: all the assholes with cars speeding along highways are formally indigent, not paying any taxes.
The fine should be proportional to the value of the car, or to a formula that includes weight an power of the vehicle
I cannot read the article, but a part of me wishes that the USA forces Europe to become more indipendent.
Huawei was cut off with all the tariffs and was hit hard, but now they came back stronger than before, and this time around USA cannot hit them anymore:
Also I drive a van and I think it’s cool since obviously I’m cool and so my car kinda has to be, too, so I’m not sure if I agree with your first point
sorry, my mistakes. Vans can be absolutely cool. I think the electric one from VW is extremely cool. It’s just not the kind of cool that people with fragile masculinity would desire
In Copenhagen, meteorologists predict the city will receive 30% more rainfall by the end of this century.
Oh shit
But is it an unethical car? It fits a lot of stuff or a lot of people or a fair amount of both, but I guess the same thing is true for the f150. Visibility is much better I guess, but would pick ups be more moral if they had a lower hood?
some thoughts about your post
Even if LLM “neurons” and their interconnections are modeled to the biological ones, LLMs aren’t modeled on human brain, where a lot is not understood.
The first thing is that how the neurons are organized is completely different. Think about the cortex and the transformer.
Second is the learning process. Nowhere close.
The fact explained in the article about how we do math, through logical steps while LLMs use resemblance is a small but meaningful example. And it also shows that you can see how LLMs work, it’s just very difficult
Very arrogant answer. Good that you have intuition, but the article is serious, especially given how LLMs are used today. The link to it is in the OP now, but I guess you already know everything…
Oh wow thank you! That’s it!
I didn’t even remember now good this article was and how many experiments it collected
I’m aware of this and agree but:
I see that asking how an LLM got to their answers as a “proof” of sound reasoning has become common
this new trend of “reasoning” models, where an internal conversation is shown in all its steps, seems to be based on this assumption of trustable train of thoughts. And given the simple experiment I mentioned, it is extremely dangerous and misleading
take a look at this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xx4Tpsk_fnM : everything is based on observing and directing this internal reasoning, and these guys are computer scientists. How can they trust this?
So having a good written article at hand is a good idea imho
What are your interests?
Anyway you could try following this community: https://lemmy.world/c/peertube
I think I’m on the right side of history
Do you?
I had lobbyists from car companies threaten me in my own office.
Ok thos is the proof. If oil and car lobbyist are angry at you then you definitely are on the right path!
It is free speech, but only for a selected few.
I’m sure the next show monolingue will be very interesting!