We have no evidence of a 1 or 2 dimensional universe existing, just like we have no evidence of a 4 dimensional universe existing. That might be because they don’t exist, or it might be because we can’t look into other universes.
If time is a dimension or not, that depends more on what you think the word “dimension” means than on what time itself is.
A coworker of mine was born in 2006. I never knew hiring toddlers was legal…
The conditions are perfect for life to thrive, and especially to evolve, we’re not so sure about forming.
Actually, I’m pretty compelled by the hypothesis that Mars actually had the perfect conditions for life to form. With less of an ocean covered surface, regular rain, and constant meteor showers. Such meteors would form holes lined with random chemicals, which then get filled with water, forming a puddle. If one puddle doesn’t have all the necessary components to form life, another likely will. That seems to me like a much better scenario than a sparsely diluted ocean on Earth.
Then whatever life originated on Mars might have been thrown into space by one of those meteors, and by chance, fell on Earth. There’s actually evidence that such interplanetary matter transfer is possible, and has happened. That would explain why we only know of a single common ancestor, the only one that arrived here.
You can think like that, until you see what AI hallucination actually looks like.
“Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates|Pilates…”
And that’s just the most outstanding example I remember off the top of my head.
AI is more susceptible to misinformation than the average AI user would be without AI.
I always think of what my dog thinks of elevators. She knows you get in it, get out, and you’re somewhere else, but does she understand it in the same way as a car? Or more like pure magic? Because in a car, she can see it moving, and going somewhere else, she doesn’t just teleport there… Idk, shower thoughts, I guess.
Because everything everyone thinks everywhere is always about america…
Rule 3: No politics
It should be taught in school, and tested. You shouldn’t be able to graduate without basic emotional intelligence.
You read articles in the shower?
Remember when Google’s motto was “Don’t be evil”?
Yes, I understood exactly what you said because, as I said before, it’s not hard to understand, it’s just badly formulated.
Natural science is amoral, a jaguar doesn’t care that a gazelle is pregnant when hunting it, since neither of them know what morality is. Scientific research is not naturally moral or immoral, it’s instance dependant. You wouldn’t call Volta immoral for stacking zinc and copper to make a battery, and you wouldn’t think twice before calling Unit 731 immoral.
You don’t get to make a normative claim, wrap it in a false equivalence between human constructs, like scientific research and morality, and the moral independency of natural science, word it inches away from historical fascist research ideals, and then complain when people fill in the blanks in the most plausible way. If you wanted a real discussion, you could’ve developed, from the start, on what you mean, and worded it better. But you didn’t, you’re just rage baiting.
You could’ve said “science is unethical by nature”, or “science is, by nature, unethical”, with commas. Those would be well formulated sentences, which would be easier to read and make sense of.
About the questions: do you oppose all ethical guidelines in science? Are there any you’re fond of? Or should science be completely unimpeded, regardless of who it damages, or what purpose it serves? Can you give any examples?
As I said, very questionable.
It’s not hard to understand, despite being badly formulated, it’s just very questionable.
If you think religion is the only reason to be a good person, you need therapy.
Never enough alternatives
Work minimum wage and be distracted from the fact we’ll all be dead in under 3 decades. That’s what the pedos in power want.
Nah, that’s an airgull. A landgull would be a chicken.
Good ending