My bad, she did not draw attention to herself whatsoever. In fact she hid in secrecy for months until he didn’t uphold his end of the agreement.

Work is work, but yea calling attention to herself is pretty dumb NGL.

For sure, nobody smart would take the deal with Musk. Only a dumb hateful person. But dumb hateful people still deserve safety and honesty, even if they don’t dole it out.

Now that’s not fair. Not everyone has the privilege to flip off Musk in that scenario. I do but most wouldn’t. I don’t blame Woht24 or any of the women Musk lured in.

I gave up my top tech career for about that amount, I’m privileged enough to do so. So absolutely yes. Check my post history where I burned bridges with xAI lol.

This lady is probably being lambasted through the media as a whore, death threats, legal risk, etc. So yes just to meet with the guy and put my life at risk I would abso-fucking-lutely need a shit ton of cash. Musk is one of the most dangerous people alive.

He promised $15m and $100k / month. Would you honestly sleep with Musk and carry the weirdo’s kid for any less? I’d need $20k/mo just to have dinner with the guy once.

See that single downvote? I did that bitches.

What other reason would tech billionaires and CEOs care to spy on you? They bought everything else, they have a privacy fetish obviously.

And the engineers who work there too.

Yes. Would you allow a company to sell actual poison that is marketed as a health food? What if a study showed 50.1% of all people believed it was not actually poisonous because of a successful marketing campaign by the company? What if innocent babies and children were ingesting this poison because their parents believed it was safe?

What if all those people believed companies shouldn’t be allowed to sell poison. But that this company should be allowed to sell their product because they mistakenly believe it’s not poison.

If you agree with banning a child killing poison but not with banning a far right party, please explain how it’s fundamentally any different.

It’s much harder to be abused when you ban the only party abusing it.

Somehow I doubt allowing it actually meaningfully helps the situation. It sounds like an alcoholic arguing that a glass of wine actually helps them not drink.

That reminds me of the time I bought a CyberTruck, my other IRL Lemmy friends thought I was super cool for buying a CyberTruck. Basically everyone on Lemmy owns a CyberTruck. Really great financing rates for CyberTruck, am I right guys?

Let’s just make it 0 already, get it over with.

I’m wondering how that stacks up to human drivers. Since the data is redacted I’m guessing not well at all.

Not your fault that the Internet is full of casual misinformation. None of us are immune from that.

American here, trick question, it’s E. Irrelevant, the driver is only paid through tips and the employer doesn’t pay payroll taxes, so his working hours are of no consequence.

If they planned a 1 month migration of a small component, 6 months to complete would be pretty lucky imo. Refactoring Legacy Code mentions the 2.0 approach they’re taking. Spoiler alert, it doesn’t work…

You could mass edit your comment history to be the same comment you got banned for. That’s what I did to cope 🖕I got banned from 5 more subreddits over it, looking at the b.s. excuses brought me some closure. The comment was “Musk’s fumes are fatally toxic”. Instaban.

Mass edit your comments while you still can. I got halfway through my history before being blocked.

Welcome friend!!