- 0 Posts
- 34 Comments
9·1 month ago“In economics, the Jevons paradox occurs when technological advancements make a resource more efficient to use (thereby reducing the amount needed for a single application); however, as the cost of using the resource drops, […] this results in overall demand increasing, causing total resource consumption to rise.” Wikipedia
If we would kill bacteria entirely, we would doom ourselves inevitably.
So No. I also was always very irritated by this quote, because from a scientific point of view this is rather incorrect, as (like you said) experiments need to be repeated, to verify the results.
If it happened, but nothing happened, did it really happen?
One of the classics.
This rule is however also broken. For example, if I come to you to ask for help, but you unkindly decline (cause unbeknown to me, you are really having a bad day), you will never receive any help from others, because you treated my like this. And as I will then reject your request for help, I will then be also excluded in the future from help from others. I.e. this rule will spiral into a bad state, because there is no forgiveness.
To solve this, we would need to make a new addition. And then we will be able fo identify another edge case, requiring another edge case. And this continues on and on.
The intention of these simple ethical/moral/social rules is to be as simple as possible, while still being a good approach. The are not intended to be absolutely followed, but to be a rule of thumb, until more information is available, to adapt properly to the situation.
And what if I don’t know (yet) how they treat others?
For trees, more like their exhaled breath.
With the interpretation of the internet being teleportation of data, your Webbrowser becomes a replicator of data, as e.g. the video that you are streaming from YouTube is merely being copied from its servers, but not deleted from its source.
In general computers are just copying data, i.e. replicating data.
But Der Postillon is basically The Onion. So posting it in this community does not make a lot of sense. Or am I mistaken?
I am just curious. So may I ask what your math education is?
For reference, what is math education?
This case here.
In the case I am discussing, the data is generated using the exponential function exp(x).
I am well aware what a graph is and that it shows the actually values, but to obtain some actually values to perform manually some calculations we need to extract some explicit values from the image. This is however not arbitrarily precise and therefore will add some noise to the extracted values.
My data is simply y = exp(x).
Your data, no because I have no access to the actually values. But just a plot of a line that seems very straight (but does not necessarily need to be), and measuring it manually will introduce some noise.
In my data, that I generated, yes there I know for a fact that it is from an exponential.
LLMs can already understand Leet. And it is not surprising, that they can, as it still exhibits the structures of a language, which LLMs are precisely designed to represent very well.