Scamper along. Seriously.

Hm. Ask a question, then answer your own question, then enjoy a satisfying climax. Very efficient.

It’s like teaching a fencepost to play the piano.

Well at least you’re consistent.

Hmm. I thought I explained this 5 times but in case you missed it

It doesn’t matter if it’s 100%. Or 99%. Or even 90 or 30. It would still be quite the nuke.

That’s the point. That it would be a nuke.

You offer so many accusations. It’s hard to keep track.

You guys need a dictator.

I’m just guiding to you a better conversation. For your own good.

To be clear, your extended tangent into clumsy self-stroking is no fun for me. I want no part of it. My point, otoh, interests me. Therefore…

Remember way back when I suggested that you return to discussing my point?

I made a post just for you. Well, and most of the people here actually.

I personally think the second language is easier to pick up because languages are 99% alike. But that is beside my point.

My point is that slide into self-reflectingness.

Like one of those old xerox machines. A copy of a copy of a copy… till the original image is gone, replaced with something crazy.

You do better. Return to discussing my point like you did ten replies back. Your shallow hackneyed handwaving just stinks up the thread.

That’s right. I did. And people who can’t see past that particular bit of treebark for the sake of discussing the forest are what we call… oh, something deeply derogatory. I forget. Use your imagination.

It doesn’t matter if it’s 100%. Or 99%. Or even 90 or 30. It would still be quite the nuke.

I think this is dead obvious. And I mentioned that.

But you can’t get past that can you?

It’s like you have your eyeball pressed up against the bark of a tree, insisting that there is no forest.

(That’s what we call a “metaphor”.)

My god man, stop inhaling your own farts, it’s killing braincells. Ground yourself in the observable.

This is facile drivel. Really. Go back to discussing the substance. How society would react etc.

Lol. You are shameless. But you are one of the few to reply with any substance (not this reply tho). So stick with the substance.

What is your problem?

I present a perfectly tasty and chewable bit of speculation and you people just react with… the usual.

Nevermind.

Yr probably right. Society would go on as usual because the bottom line is, ultimately, unaffected.

But, squishy moods on a mass scale constitute the weather of politics and commerce. From that angle, big things might happen.

Consider the general stress of a population : X. When x goes up we vote and shop thusly. That’s a known thing.

And x would definitely go up here.So such a hackyvirus could be a tool in shifting a close election or selling an unpopular product.

(Not to mention the effect on phone sales, attitudes towards privacy, the eternally eroding nuclear family…)

So that’s a thing to think about.