• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle








  • I think in the future, it is advisable to use larger distributions where a lot of eyes look at, like Debian.

    This reminds me of the time when Debian broke their OpenSSL and for two years, ssh keys generated on Debian were basically taken from a pool of only 32k different keys…

    That time it was an honest mistake, but it would actually have been a very efficient attack too if it had been intentional. Imagine succeeding at getting your target to use private keys for ssh or ssl etc. from a tiny pool that makes something usually impossible to brute force suddenly trivial. And nobody noticed it for two years.



  • It doesn’t seem to be based on petroleum, since they’re explicitly comparing it to petroleum-based plastics…

    There also are other non-petroleum based plastics that dissolve in water. This part is not new. E.g. polyvinyl alcohol is used widely.

    What’s new about this one is that it specifically needs salt to dissolve and they claim it’s otherwise relatively sturdy. So maybe it could be used instead of pet bottles for drinks? Or maybe they’re not quite there yet but it’s a new step in that direction…



  • IMHO, if you’re discouraged by reality, that’s not my problem. I don’t like it when people just scream “ban” but don’t actually have a plan beyond that to get 30% of the voters to not vote for the next party that uses the nazi talking points.

    You say that all the counterexamples don’t negate the one time it worked, but there is no successful example of banning a nazi party in Germany. They keep coming back. Learning some lessons is exactly what is needed here, because so far the NSDAP has been banned twice, the DVFP has been banned once, the SRP has been banned once, the FAP has been banned once, the NL has been banned once, attempts to ban the NPD failed twice before they lost funding in the third attempt, and now here we are and another nazi party is polling close to 30%.


  • I’m not advocating for not trying. Just saying that “it worked once” is not a good argument. I think the only ideology of a party that was banned in Germany that actually doesn’t matter in today’s political landscape is communism. But there still are nazis even though the NSDAP was banned twice, there still are social democrats even though they were banned for 20 years, etc.

    There’s also that more recently, Germany failed to ban the NPD twice and that was this century.

    I think the AfD should be banned, but the people voting for them also need to become less stupid, and a ban alone will not do that.






  • I’m not sure how much sense it makes to complain that an AI chat bot collects so many categories of data and then highlight “user input”, which it obviously needs to function? Like how is something like DeepSeek the “middle ground” if that’s what the author thinks is the biggest problem with it? When I look at DeepSeek on the app store, it does list at least “coarse location”, so why not highlight that? DeepSeek can’t answer my questions about e.g. “restaurants nearby”, unlike e.g. ChatGPT, which comes up with a map. So that’s what I would be interested in, what DeepSeek uses my location for.

    Although just in principle this kind of analysis rarely finds surprises.

    If you can enter text or click on things in an online app, obviously it collects user input.

    If it can refer back to previous answers, obviously it retains chat history.

    If it can process pictures, obviously it collects photos if you upload any.

    If it can be interacted with using voice, obviously it collects audio.

    If it can answer questions about things near you, obviously it will use location data.

    If there are IAPs, it better not forget that you bought those, too.

    And so on.