The Game is a thing birthed from 4chan back in the day. The rules are: 1. Don’t think about the game. 2. If you think about the game. You lose the game .

You’re not part of the 28-40 male demographic are you?

You’re using a lot of very loosely defined terms with a lot of certainty. Machine learning is AI, we just usually apply it to the more simple versions of it. Where do you personally draw the line? I fully understand the plethora of risks, downsides, and injustices that can potentially be involved in the matter, but I legitimately don’t understand the extremist level hatred that some people express to anything that could hold the title of AI. To me, it parallels with someone saying that they hate ionizing radiation. Frequently, it’s also bad, and your entirely reasonable to try and avoid it on a daily basis, but it also has many uses that are beneficial and life-saving.

Every last bit of it? What is your stance on use of AI for tasks such as data analysis of massive sets for scientific research, or procedural automation of massive operations?

Because the CCP is doing it’s level best to eradicate it. He can’t return to Tibet or he’ll be arrested, and China used pretzel logic to install their own lama who they have political control over. He’s afraid that the nice folks at the CCP will make hell out of the life of whatever kid is chosen after he dies, until he either submits to them or disappears. Fuck China.

Heads are easy to come by. You want a head? I can get you a head by 3 o’clock this afternoon…

So, just the right amount of safe then?

Ya. It’s a joke, and that’s how jokes work. In this essay, I will explain, examine, and critique every known form of Homo sapiens humor.

In the beginning…

No. For the same reason that they didn’t demolish Auschwitz. We must learn from our follies, lest we repeat them.