Once a model for the world, the EU’s rulemaking machine has faltered under the weight of its own ambition.

Paywall? https://archive.is/CmWdg

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      I downvoted it for the paywall, then went into the comments to whine, only to find the archive link.

      Some people might not have done that second bit.

      • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Most, if not all, that I post have an archive link if there’s a paywall.

        Good that you got to read the article at least. 😀

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    The EU regulations have earned a reputation for being a bit of a mess. While very robust, they’re less agile and predictable and have raised the bar to the extent that the EU has become the most costly and time-consuming jurisdiction to get medical device approval,” he said.

    By which margin? 10% more is acceptable, 10 times more will kill innovation.

    The advantage of the unified market is that there are less regulations to process. The EU kills their advantage by creating more regulations.

    The blind spot is that in the past, new EU regulations reduced the complexity of national regulations. Now everything is unified and new EU regulations are not a net efficiency improvement.

    • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Not everything is unified sadly. I read somewhere that when it comes to services, the different rules within the EU is effectively a 40% tariff between EU countries.

      There is much to be done, if only people could set aside national interests and understand that it’s EU27 vs World and not Finland vs Italy or Greece vs Luxembourg.