

There exist some horror stories about the code but I have no idea how to find them.


There exist some horror stories about the code but I have no idea how to find them.


Germany’s foreign intelligence service
Agency personnel will be allowed to enter homes to install espionage technology
They haven’t done that before? - or are we talking about Germany?


it’s Trump
For an Alzheimer guy he is executing quite elaborate plans. The problem is that we reset every day and blame Trump anew. By now we should know the names of the top planners and advisers and their goals.


Russia has influenced the USA, the UK, Italy and is about to turn Germany and France, not to forget the countries in Africa.
How is that posible? Do we have to remake our intelligence services?
I am sure that they did some financing but there must be others who do the heavy lifting and our intelligence services silently have approved it.


Less regulations, more freedom. Whether that’s true, that’s another thing.
The EU regulations have earned a reputation for being a bit of a mess. While very robust, they’re less agile and predictable and have raised the bar to the extent that the EU has become the most costly and time-consuming jurisdiction to get medical device approval,” he said.
By which margin? 10% more is acceptable, 10 times more will kill innovation.
The advantage of the unified market is that there are less regulations to process. The EU kills their advantage by creating more regulations.
The blind spot is that in the past, new EU regulations reduced the complexity of national regulations. Now everything is unified and new EU regulations are not a net efficiency improvement.


To avoid tariffs and because the elites have agreed to do so. The EU promised to buy US gas despite not being able to do so. So there must exist agreenents outside the law. I expect the same for manufacturing.


Why?
These assumptions are not so inevitable considering how the US can compensate them:
if the US dollar ceases to be the world currency
Fascism helps to fight the wars that prevent anybody from dropping the dollar. Libya and Iraq don’t have to be the last ones.
They’ll end up being in charge of an barely populated unproductive wasteland
Not if Europe doesn’t have enough energy for their industries and has to shift them to the US. It hurts to see, but that’s what is happening.
Downvoters, why does this not answer OP’s question?


How could Trump with his known Russian connections get past the American billionaires?


literally
approved a bill to allow U.S. military bases on Danish soil
Independent from whom? The USA? Then let’s not copy the American declaration of independence. Without going down conspiracy lane there is nothing above the EU. There is no need for independence.
There is a need for original thought. We want European Facebook, AWS, search engine, AI, StarLink, electric cars - all after the US has shown us that it is useful. If we copy the US, we will also copy the current dismantling. If we want independence, we should learn to think independently first.


It could be that the journalists got a tip.


and has now asked for more safety nets.
He wants the EU to provide an extra cash buffer on top of financial guarantees and increased safeguards to cover potential legal disputes and settlements — an idea many governments oppose.
Nearly all the Russian assets are housed in Euroclear, a financial depository in Brussels.
To push the risk onto Belgium will turn the EU evil. If the risk is so low then it should be easy to give these guarantees. If they are not given then the EU is abusing Belgium because the risk is actually high.


Why would you think otherwise?
Because of comment’s like this one from von der Leyen. People with brain will see through them and avoid the EU. Allowing entrance doesn’t mean that the skilled people will come.
I’m sorry to tell you but that ship has already sailed.
We can still change the destination.


It is.
It is also obviously too early for me to write comments.


I was banned by a mod for suggesting that human rights and fascism are not mutually exclusive and that fascism shouldn’t be defined by that.
It means that a fascist country can pay lip service to human rights which is dangerous. It also means that in theory, there could be a fascist country that respects human rights fully. That seems to require the disclaimer that there are other reasons why fascism is not good.
Of course it could also be any other comment.


What is fascist about saying that we shouldn’t treat people like expendible slaves?
Or rather, thanks for the feedback. I wasn’t aware that it could be seen as fascist.


As if people can be motivated to come to Europe on a whim and only haven’t come because we only accepted them from a dangerous entrance by sketchy boat.
Even if it works, it’s an expression of values that will corrupt the EU forever. *
* Not because we invite foreigners but because we treat workers as objects.


Flood the Zone. Do we want it to be incompetence or can we be sure?
Look at what the west does to Iraq, Libya, Syria and other countries. How can Russia be safe if the US don’t continue arm restriction treaties and develop space weapons against MAD?