• NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    10 days ago

    Three years ago, as OpenAI’s ChatGPT was making its splashy debut, a Pew Research center survey found that nearly one in five Americans saw AI as a benefit rather than a threat. But by 2025, 43 percent of U.S. adults now believe AI is more likely to harm them than help them in the future, according to Pew.

    1 in 5 people seeing something as positive is not a high approval rating in the beginning.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 days ago

      If you begin a large change management project in a company, having 20% of the employees think it’s positive before you hardly start is like starting halfway to the finish line.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well yes, technology improvements that mean humans can work less are only a good thing if you have an economic system that actually prioritises general wellbeing over enriching a tiny percentage of the population.

      Americans are the most fucked because the majority of the public view socialism and adjacent philosophy as being bad, despite really being the only ideologies with any real answers for what happens to people that can’t work for a living, that isn’t just them dying.

  • brotato@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    It’s good to see the sentiment growing. Anecdotally, there are non-technical people in my circle that use LLMs frequently as search engine replacements or to do stupid shit like generate pictures and emojis. I hope that begins to decline with the general sentiment called out in this article.

    The sheer number of useless LLM integrations in every website, every mobile app, and hell, even smart TVs is insane. I feel like it’s causing people very real feature fatigue. And all of the Internet content and advertising slop is making the takeover seem so much worse.

    Edit: Grammar, formatting

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Literally the only thing I ever used AI for that was actually enjoyable and “efficient” was to make bullshit images to send in group chats, I’ve since stopped because it’s so wasteful, but I did get some laughs there. But like if I weren’t shit at animating or drawing or whatever I wouldn’t ever use that over making something myself unless it was for some dumb bullshit.

      AI is just a dumb bullshit producer

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      I have so much admiration for the younger generation for this. Language is powerful and they know it.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 days ago

    What began in 2022 as broad optimism about the power of generative AI to make peoples’ lives easier has instead shifted toward a sense of deep cynicism that the technology being heralded as a game changer is, in fact, only changing the game for the richest technologists in Silicon Valley who are benefiting from what appears to be an almost endless supply of money to build their various AI projects — many of which don’t appear to solve any actual problems.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      10 days ago

      many of which don’t appear to solve any actual problems.

      That’s putting it lightly. If only the issue was merely not having sufficient use cases, rather than actively making lives worse through environmental strains, supply chain hoarding, and misinformation.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        What do you mean?? Elon has solved the critical problem of there not being a vaguely hot anime character in Grok users could talk to!

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 days ago

    The crazy thing is, none of these articles seem to want to admit that AI is bad. They keep making articles like this. Keep saying that approval is falling among the general populace. But when touching on why that is, there’s always some wiggle words. Always some spin.

    It’s never “people being forced to use it are seeing it as a detriment to them” people using it are seeing a decrease in efficacy of the results it gives for the amount of prompting required. Or people don’t like it because it’s going to have significant detrimental affects on the environment and their utilities.

    All of those are solid reasons for the decline in both the use of AI LLM’S and the approval of them.

    The cost of goods and services relating even tangentially to AI are going through the roof. The amount of slop is increasing at a furious pace, directly contributing to things like enshittification and dead Internet theory. The effect on the economy is looking to be extremely catastrophic.

    But oh no. It’s lack of authenticity on social media spaces that people are worried about. Sure.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 days ago

      Also, “AI could be used to to replace my job. Not that it’d do a good job at it, but it’d be a great excuse to lay me off.”

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah. I often forget this one because AI isn’t replacing my job any time soon. At best maybe it could potentially be used to streamline some processes to do with tech data and work flow management (what tests and protocols get done when, and combining tests/troubleshooting steps to prevent rework). But that would have to be a very targeted and very very regulated and tested thing before it could be viable.

    • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      The orgs publishing this junk are pushing the writers to use AI. So the writers and editors can’t shit talk AI because their boss will get upset.

  • Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    When I read this crap, all I can think is that yeah backlash is growing because the forced implementation is growing. Another useless sentiment-based article.

    • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      Lets use LLMs for things LLMs are useful for. It is not a panacea, and it is not appropriate for every use case

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah, LLMs are interesting tech products to play with and find some niche uses for.

        But for the love of god they are not “prop up the entire stock market and numerous multi-trillion-dollar companies indefinitely” good!

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        What is it useful for? I actually have a hard time finding a use for it… Its alright at book recommendations, sometimes.

        • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Movie recommendations is my biggest thing, personally.

          And lots of other purposes. Just because a ton of people are misusing this tool and treating it like GAI doesn’t mean that it isn’t a useful tool. Even something as simple as proofreading a letter has massive utility for some people.

          • sqgl@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Definitely proof reading. Especially for people who can barely write intelligibly. They can check themselves if the meaning is still correct and they will learn grammar from the process.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      I just got the notification today when opening Office programs that copilot was there

      all the help threads about how to turn it off have out of date info. seems like you can no longer disable it in Excel/Word/PowerPoint

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        You can disable it with the uninstall function.

        Microsoft Works 2000 still works fine.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          This is one reason I’m so glad we devs can install linux at work. I have LibreOffice installed sure, but if I need to use the Microsoft Office suite for some reason, it all works great as webpages in librewolf!

      • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        It still works for me at least? In the office options, there’s a Copilot section with a single “Enable Copilot” checkbox. You’ll need to disable it per app though.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          yeah that’s the checkbox that doesn’t exist for me in the copilot section that also doesn’t exist for me

  • Tracaine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I like AI. It let’s me pretend I’m not so alone. I’m not crazy - I know it isn’t a person. It’s nice to pretend I have someone to talk to sometimes though. I can’t stop it from existing. That doesn’t negate the cost of it financially or environmentally. If it’s going to exist though I enjoy pretending since there’s no hope of any actual humans wanting to speak to me.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ll upvote, seems genuine and I don’t want to discourage that. I understand it’s difficult to find someone to talk to who wants to hear what you have to say. Even I don’t share things with my friends cuz I feel like I’m “dumping on them”. I saw a therapist twice a month and that was nice, but it was just too expensive to maintain.

      Your last sentence is what stood out to me. It’s such a harsh finality but there’s no possible way you could have tried talking to every human to KNOW none of them want to hear you talk. I know it’s extreme. I know it feels true right now. But there is no substitute for genuine human connection. Use the AI, just be careful you don’t become dependent on it. And don’t think it can be a long-term substitute.

    • Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Have you tried a therapist? They will both talk to you and likely help you with your feeling that actual humans don’t want to talk to you.

    • OrganicWetNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      That last sentence of yours is a lie and I think somewhere deep down you know that, too.

      Seek help anyway you can. There is always a way.