• TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    6 months ago

    What sort of universal reference frame do you seem to be assuming? All location is relative to other things, and keeping your location relative to, say, the Earth would be a lot more convenient that making it relative to some arbitrary star or something.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Op thinks the universe is built with some inherently absolute positioning method. Thanks for writing this

    • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Use the time and space machine on a ruler and send it back in time a pico second, then a millisecond, then a thousand, then a second, then a minute. You just have to calibrate with measurements first.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      But if you’re in a moving car and “pop” back a few seconds while the car doesn’t you won’t be in the car anymore. If it worked more like rewinding a video you wouldn’t need to do much, but I’m assuming OP means literally going “poof” and now you’re back in time. If that’s the case, you would still need to know how Earth is moving through spacetime. If you don’t know your relativistic relationship to the Earth and every other object in the universe then how would you know where you are or your own relativity compared to the Earth?

  • Fetus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I get that people just refer to them as time machines, but they’re actually space-time vehicles.

    Before your first journey, you calibrate it to a reference point (mine already had Earth mapped out, with a gravity well depth monitor as a fail-safe) so that you lock your target coordinates in space and time.

    But no, it’s not teleportation. You’re still just travelling to your destination, you just get there as quick as you want and without the need to be disintegrated.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Space and time are the same thing. Spacetime. Time travel would necessarily also by teleportation if you are traveling instantaneously through spacetime. Unless of course your travel is continuous like it is currently for all of us, just sped up, slowed down or reversed.

    Also there is no objective point of reference for location in the universe, only relative points of reference. In other words, you are always some distance in some direction from some thing. But you never have objective stable coordinates relative to the universe itself. There is no “center” or other fixed point of the universe. So the earth is moving, yes, but only relative to other independent celestial bodies. And those bodies are moving, too, relative to other bodies. Their movement is always relative to a non-absolute frame of reference. No movement is objective to the universe, it’s all relative.

    So it would be illogical to expect the earth to have moved X miles away in Y direction if you teleported one second into the past/future because that would presuppose that your location was objective and absolute in the universe at the point of time traveling and the earth moved relative to your absolute location. It would break known physics if that were the case, as much as time travel itself would.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      🤔

      If only there was some kind of theory that could explain relativity.

      Especially in large celestial objects.

  • RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tell me you didn’t pay attention in Spatial Distortion as Applied to Time Dilation class without telling me you didn’t pay attention in Spatial Distortion as Applied to Time Dilation class.

  • troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    You’re obviously the main character in this simulation so it’s much more likely that all other coordinates are derived from your position in the simulation engine.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s why I always liked approaches that use a physical machine that has to stay in one place for an extended period of time. Quantum Break’s hard sci-fi approach to this was fascinating and kept making me reconsider how the time loop worked. Highly recommended for time loop nerds like me.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Forget the orbit… remember the song…

    https://genius.com/Monty-python-the-galaxy-song-lyrics

    “Just remember that you’re standing on a planet that’s evolving
    And revolving
    at 900 miles an hour.
    It’s orbiting at 19 miles a second,
    so it’s reckoned,
    The sun that is the source of all our power.
    Now the sun, and you and me,
    and all the stars that we can see,
    Are moving at a million miles a day,
    In the outer spiral arm,
    at 40,000 miles an hour,
    Of a galaxy we call the Milky Way.”

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    That’s correct. But if you’ve figured out how to travel through time, traveling through space should be easy.

    Also, be sure to wear a hazard suit so you don’t die from any ancient/future diseases your body has no protection from.

  • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    A wormhole type time machine would leave the travel points A and B physically independent of each other. This opens up the option to change destinations… step in at New York, exit in San Francisco.

    • 7uWqKj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Due to the energies involved, creating a wormhole between two cities would probably leave you with a wormhole and no cities.

  • ns1@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is interesting because the most “realistic” (i.e. still not realistic) depictions of time travel in fiction involve travelling through a singularity or wormhole. So you probably have to be in space to start with, but also both ends of the wormhole have mass so they can be orbiting a planet or star and stay within a stable distance of it. It solves this particular problem (just leaving the other usual problem of causality!) It also proves your point since it does allow travelling in space, in fact it allows travelling faster than light.

    I think the converse is true as well, that if faster than light travel is possible then time travel must be possible, at least if you take relativity at face value. As others have pointed out there’s no universal reference frame, and for any journey that is faster than light in one reference frame, there is another frame in which the journey goes backwards in time.

  • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yep, and not to mention the position of our solar system in the Milky Way or our galaxy in the local cluster. In fact, without a specific reference frame you would have to make corrections very rapidly for even a tiny jump in time.

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There was a not very good TV show Seven Days that used this well. They had a time machine that could go back in time seven days. The pilot had to fly the machine chasing the earth as he traveled back in time.

      He would usually end up crashing it somewhere and have to find a phone to call for pickup.

      • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yep, and he had to also solve the problem of the week given everything they could figure out in the 7 days following it happening. A cool set of limitations for the writers, the execution was a little sloppy, but overall a cool idea.