

Sure wish they mentioned the effeciency.


Sure wish they mentioned the effeciency.


Apparently only one other person in these comments actually read the article. They failed to disclose that the game was released with AI assets. Whether this action was purposeful or not, their submission was disqualified according to the rules. That’s really all there is to it.
I think it’s stupid.
If so, shouldn’t it then be “Everyone:” followed by nothing?
No one nothing?


Christ, they really are a death cult


How am I the first person to ask why they’re measuring the latency on everyone’s keystrokes?


It doesn’t even actually learn, though.


I thought that there was a study that showed limited returns on happiness beyond a certain threshold ($75k at the time, which is now surely well out-of-date).


Okay. How are they impacted by rules on urban development?


Huh? This story is literally about the man doing something stupid: leaving in unsecured, loaded firearm where an animal could accidentally trigger it.
I mean, I guess they could be even dumber than that,* but the prior offense should be more than enough to bar them from ever owning a firearm again, right?
… right? …
… What do you mean, they work for ICE now? …


If only there were a good boy with a gun


Right, do if an area isn’t rural, it’s not considered rural.


Why? The rural areas are by definition not urban.


Dog is cost money?


Well, one out of three is … pretty unremarkable, actually


I am an Italian man who eats mushrooms and stomps turtles
I’ve already got them tagged as “fascist simp,” so they might just be a fan of child rape